HyperWorks Solvers

Nonlinear Analysis of a Lap Joint

Nonlinear Analysis of a Lap Joint

Previous topic Next topic No expanding text in this topic  

Nonlinear Analysis of a Lap Joint

Previous topic Next topic JavaScript is required for expanding text JavaScript is required for the print function  

lap_joint

Summary


Two overlapping plates (aluminum) are connected by a rivet (titanium) forming a lap joint. The aluminum and titanium materials are both defined by piece-wise linear elasto-plastic law. The plates and the rivet are meshed with solid elements. The free end of the bottom plate is constrained and the free end of the top plate is pulled (by applying imposed displacement) to shear the joint. An all inclusive contact is defined such that all the components in the model are master and all nodes of the model are slave.

This example is considered a static problem and the nonlinear implicit solver is used.

 

Title

Lap joint

lap_joint2

Number

40.1

Brief Description

A lap joint is fixed at one end and pulled at the other to shear the joint.

Keywords

Nonlinear large displacement analysis (NLGEOM)
Contact definition (CONTACT)
Plasticity and Piece-wise linear elasto-plastic material (MATX36 and TABLES1)

OptiStruct Options

Parameters for Geometric Nonlinear Implicit Static Analysis Control (NLPARMX)
Boundary conditions (SPC)
Imposed displacement (SPCD and NLOAD1)
Solid element (PSOLIDX)
Contact property for NLGEOM analysis (PCONTX)

Input File

Lap_joint: <install_directory>/demos/hwsolvers/optistruct/lap_joint.fem

Technical / Theoretical Level

Beginner

Overview


Aim of the Problem

The purpose of this example is to demonstrate a nonlinear large displacement implicit analysis (NLGEOM) involving elasto-plastic material and contact using OptiStruct.

Physical Problem Description

The top and bottom plates have a length of 30mm, width of 20mm and height of 1.5mm. The rivet is 8mm in diameter and 6mm in height. The geometry of the joint is shown in Figure 1. Due to symmetry only half of the joint is modeled.

 

lap_joint_geometry

Fig 1: Geometry of the joint.

The material used for the aluminum plates have the following properties:

Density: 1.2e-9 Mg/mm3
Young’s modulus: 71700 MPa
Poisson’s ratio: 0.33
Yield stress: 350 MPa

The stress vs plastic strain plot for aluminum is shown in Figure 2.

plastic_strain_aluminum

Fig 2: Stress – plastic strain curve for aluminum

The material used for the titanium rivet has the following properties:

Density: 7.8e-9 Mg/mm3
Young’s modulus: 112000 MPa
Poisson’s ratio: 0.34
Yield stress: 907 MPa

The stress vs plastic strain plot for titanium is shown in Figure 3.

plastic_strain_titanium

Fig 3: Stress – plastic strain curve for titanium

Analysis, Assumptions and Modeling Description


Geometric Linear (NLSTAT) or Geometric Nonlinear (NLGEOM) Analysis

In a geometric linear analysis all deformations and rotations are small – displacements of 5% of the model dimension are considered small.

For this lap joint example, the final deformations and strains after shearing of the lap joint are 9.5% of the largest dimension of the model (30mm). So, the geometrically nonlinear static NLSTAT analysis could not be considered for this example.

Modeling Methodology

The mesh is a regular solid mesh with the plates being around 1.5mm in dimension and the rivet being around 0.5mm in dimension.

The plates and rivet have been modeled using first order fully-integrated solid elements.

PSOLID          4       1

PSOLIDX        4      14     222             VAR

 

The boundary conditions applied in the model are shown in Figure 4.

lap_joint_bc

Fig 4: Boundary conditions

The imposed displacements are defined in FEM file using NLOAD1 card:

 

SPCD           3     572  1     2.5    

………………

TABLED1        8  LINEAR  LINEAR

+            0.0     0.0     1.0     1.0ENDT  

NLOAD1         7       3            DISP       8

 

OptiStruct Options Used

An all inclusive general purpose contact has been defined in the model. All the nodes of the model are defined as slave and all components in the model are defined as the master.

SET     2       GRID    LIST  

+       1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8      

+       9       10      11      12      13      14      15      16

………………………………

SET     7       ELEM    PROP  

+       4       5       6  

 

CONTACT        6       7       2       7 OPENGAP  

 

A small physical gap of around 0.02mm has been introduced between the top and bottom plates and also between the plates and the rivet. The minimum gap specified (0.022) for the contact is slightly higher than the physical gap for contact to take effect. A static Coulomb friction of 0.05 is defined for the interface.

PCONT          7        AUTO  

PCONTX        7          0.05    0.022                  0

+                               CONST      

+                                             4

+

+           COUL   STIFF

+

 

The plasticity and contact causes major nonlinearities; therefore, a static nonlinear analysis is performed using the arc-length displacement strategy. The time step is determined by a displacement norm control.

The nonlinear implicit parameters used are:

Implicit type:

Static nonlinear

Nonlinear solver:

BFGS Quasi-Newton method

Termination criteria:

Relative residual in force

Tolerance:

0.01

Update of stiffness matrix:

5 iterations maximum

Time step control method:

Arc-length

Initial time step:

0.01

Minimum time step:

1e-5

Maximum time step:

0.05

Line search method:

AUTO

Special Residual force computation with contact interfaces present:

0

Desired convergence iteration number:

6

Maximum convergence iteration number:

20

Decreasing time step factor:

0.8

Maximum increasing time step scale factor:

1.02

Arc-length:

Automatic computation

Spring-back option:

No.

 

A solver method is required to resolve Ax=b in each iteration of a nonlinear cycle. The linear implicit options used are:

Linear solver:

Direct (BCS)

Precondition methods:

Factored approximate Inverse

Maximum iterations number:

System dimension (NDOF)

Stop criteria:

Relative residual of preconditioned matrix

Tolerance for stop criteria:

Machine precision

 

The input nonlinear implicit options set in the FEM file are defined by NLPARMX:

 

NLPARM         9     100                                       P

+                   0.01

NLPARMX        9     0.0     0.1    0.01      -1      40

+           BFGS     ARC    1e-5    0.05    AUTO

+

+              6    1.02      20     0.8

Refer to the OptiStruct manual for more details about implicit options.

The nonlinear large deformation analysis has to be defined through a subcase. An NLPARM statement, as well as ANALYSIS=NLGEOM has to be present in the subcase. The termination time of 1.0s is defined through the TTERM entry.

SUBCASE       1

ANALYSIS NLGEOM

 SPC =       10

 NLPARM =        9

 NLOAD =        7

 TTERM = 1.000

Simulation Results and Conclusions


Animations

The displacement, stresses (mises) and plastic strain results after the shearing of the joint are shown in the following figures.

lap_joint_displacements

Fig 5: Displacements (max = 2.84mm)

lap_joint_stress

Fig 6: Stress (max = 1022 MPa)

lap_joint_aluminum

Fig 7: Plastic strain in aluminum plates (max. = 23.86%).